Get CTO or GM-level feedback on your documents before the meeting. Format-aware, persona-aware review based on Kent Beck's 3X framework.
This is not generic “make it clearer” AI feedback. The skill detects your document format—one-pager, PRFAQ, PRD, decision doc—and applies format-specific standards so the critique matches what reviewers actually look for. On top of that, it layers persona-specific critique: a CTO lens for engineering simplicity and delivery risk, and a GM lens for product–market fit, phase clarity, and decision quality.
You get feedback you can act on before the meeting, instead of discovering gaps when an exec asks the one question you didn’t anticipate.
Focuses on feature fit versus stack complexity, the green-field fallacy (“we’ll just rebuild it”), whether the approach is as simple as it can be, and phasing risk—can you ship incrementally or are you betting the quarter on a big bang?
Grounds the idea in Kent Beck’s 3X framework: clarity of phase (Explore / Expand / Extract), whether the problem has real gravity for customers, and concrete adoption mechanics—not just “users will love it.”
Stress-tests decision clarity (what exactly are we choosing?), ownership and accountability, reversibility if we’re wrong, and opportunity cost—what we’re not doing because we chose this path.
Accepts a Google Docs link (via integration where configured) or text you paste directly, so the review runs on the real artifact—not a summary you typed from memory.
Classifies the doc as Concept, Problem/Solution, Decision, PRFAQ, PRD, or general—then applies the right rubric for structure, depth, and missing sections.
Infers or uses your stated lens: CTO (engineering and delivery), GM (business and strategy), or a balanced general review when you don’t specify.
Outputs format-aware notes (what’s wrong with the doc as that type of doc) plus persona-aware critique (what that leader would push on), prioritized so you can revise quickly.
Clone the repo and start using this skill in under 60 seconds.